<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for haggis, bagpipes, claymores, and kilts.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sthorwall.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sthorwall.com</link>
	<description>An extended foray into Scottish territory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Spliced Beyond Re-cognition by Kara</title>
		<link>http://sthorwall.com/2009/08/07/spliced-beyond-re-cognition/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sthorwall.com/?p=185#comment-133</guid>
		<description>....have been in Boston for the past 2 months... got lost on internet... can&#039;t find my way back...HELP! stuck in alternate universe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.have been in Boston for the past 2 months&#8230; got lost on internet&#8230; can&#8217;t find my way back&#8230;HELP! stuck in alternate universe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spliced Beyond Re-cognition by carpefides</title>
		<link>http://sthorwall.com/2009/08/07/spliced-beyond-re-cognition/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>carpefides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sthorwall.com/?p=185#comment-87</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it.&quot; -C.S. Lewis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it.&#8221; -C.S. Lewis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spliced Beyond Re-cognition by sthorwall</title>
		<link>http://sthorwall.com/2009/08/07/spliced-beyond-re-cognition/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>sthorwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sthorwall.com/?p=185#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Spot on, good thoughts, comments I want to interact with. I&#039;ll reply with my next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on, good thoughts, comments I want to interact with. I&#8217;ll reply with my next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spliced Beyond Re-cognition by Tai Schutz</title>
		<link>http://sthorwall.com/2009/08/07/spliced-beyond-re-cognition/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai Schutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sthorwall.com/?p=185#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I get writing fear a lot.  Especially considering my genre.  Seriously, Solomon had it right: &#039;there is nothing new under the sun.&#039;  Even though I&#039;ve known this for years about the scifi/fantasy genre, I still get nervous when I recognize I&#039;m using a trope or a common idea/plotline.  In fact, I will even go out of my way to avoid common phrases that people often write, just because I want to be different.  I noticed that I don&#039;t like using , &#039;he said,&#039; plainly, just as is without a different descriptor, because &#039;everyone&#039; uses &#039;he said.&#039;  

Seriously, &#039;everyone&#039; uses &#039;he said&#039; because it is an easy way to keep dialogue flowing, and make your character inscrutable for the moment, while letting the reader put their own connotation on the phrase.  For me, it often comes down to trusting the reader to understand what I&#039;m doing and like me because/despite it all.

And in all reality, all books in a genre share the same stereotypes because that&#039;s what a genre is--a grouping for stereotypes.  You can&#039;t have a western that doesn&#039;t have &#039;the west,&#039; (whether that means six shooters, indians, card sharks, saloons, or just the aura of the old time west) and you can&#039;t have fantasy without the fantastical and sometimes even the mundane.  There&#039;s a reason that many ideas repeat themselves in books (especially as regard to people) because people don&#039;t change.  So there will always be the &#039;wide eyed farmboy&#039; because there are always innocents in the world getting in over their head.  And if we want them to survive, there often needs to be the &#039;wise old sage&#039; who keeps them from killing themselves out of ignorance.  And yeah, we&#039;ve seen it fifty million times before, but it&#039;s a truth, and if you dress it up enough it&#039;s still the same truth, but not as blatantly obvious. 

If you want direct plagarism, compare Lotr to Terry Brooks&#039; Sword of Shannara.  I kid you not, you will see fifty million parallels.  Then go take a look at Patrick Rothfuss&#039; Name of the Wind.  Same sorts of themes and ideas, but totally different constructions, which makes one a terrible piece of writing, and the other startlingly good to read.

So, enough diatribe.  Most of that&#039;s just stuff I try to remind myself of when I get too down about writing.  Hope it helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get writing fear a lot.  Especially considering my genre.  Seriously, Solomon had it right: &#8216;there is nothing new under the sun.&#8217;  Even though I&#8217;ve known this for years about the scifi/fantasy genre, I still get nervous when I recognize I&#8217;m using a trope or a common idea/plotline.  In fact, I will even go out of my way to avoid common phrases that people often write, just because I want to be different.  I noticed that I don&#8217;t like using , &#8216;he said,&#8217; plainly, just as is without a different descriptor, because &#8216;everyone&#8217; uses &#8216;he said.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Seriously, &#8216;everyone&#8217; uses &#8216;he said&#8217; because it is an easy way to keep dialogue flowing, and make your character inscrutable for the moment, while letting the reader put their own connotation on the phrase.  For me, it often comes down to trusting the reader to understand what I&#8217;m doing and like me because/despite it all.</p>
<p>And in all reality, all books in a genre share the same stereotypes because that&#8217;s what a genre is&#8211;a grouping for stereotypes.  You can&#8217;t have a western that doesn&#8217;t have &#8216;the west,&#8217; (whether that means six shooters, indians, card sharks, saloons, or just the aura of the old time west) and you can&#8217;t have fantasy without the fantastical and sometimes even the mundane.  There&#8217;s a reason that many ideas repeat themselves in books (especially as regard to people) because people don&#8217;t change.  So there will always be the &#8216;wide eyed farmboy&#8217; because there are always innocents in the world getting in over their head.  And if we want them to survive, there often needs to be the &#8216;wise old sage&#8217; who keeps them from killing themselves out of ignorance.  And yeah, we&#8217;ve seen it fifty million times before, but it&#8217;s a truth, and if you dress it up enough it&#8217;s still the same truth, but not as blatantly obvious. </p>
<p>If you want direct plagarism, compare Lotr to Terry Brooks&#8217; Sword of Shannara.  I kid you not, you will see fifty million parallels.  Then go take a look at Patrick Rothfuss&#8217; Name of the Wind.  Same sorts of themes and ideas, but totally different constructions, which makes one a terrible piece of writing, and the other startlingly good to read.</p>
<p>So, enough diatribe.  Most of that&#8217;s just stuff I try to remind myself of when I get too down about writing.  Hope it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spliced Beyond Re-cognition by Kara</title>
		<link>http://sthorwall.com/2009/08/07/spliced-beyond-re-cognition/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sthorwall.com/?p=185#comment-84</guid>
		<description>ok, it&#039;s been a week &amp; a half. I may buy splicing once, but definitely not twice. ;)

Write some more. More often. We are all waiting. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, it&#8217;s been a week &amp; a half. I may buy splicing once, but definitely not twice. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Write some more. More often. We are all waiting. </p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
